A year ago today, I was lying on an operating table in Indianapolis while a very good surgeon sliced out a lymph node chock full o'teratoma. Time flies when you're having fun! Today, the scar looks OK, although the top part is a bit uglier than the bottom part (my guess would be that several of the urology interns took turns stapling me back together after surgery, and some did a better job than others). It's by far the best $25,000 ever spent on me.
Life goes on. Hallelujah.
Showing posts with label teratoma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label teratoma. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Wednesday, May 24, 2006
Coming soon on DVD!
[Fade in...]
Pathologist: "It's cancer."
[Dissolve to...]
Pathologist: "Sorry, I was smoking crack, is isn't cancer."
[Cut to title with voiceover]
Announcer: "Who cares what the hell it is?"
Check it out on video (it's in four parts, this is part one of four). No, it's not my actual surgery, but a close facsimile thereof. Although not for the squeamish, I happen to find it very cool.
Anyhoo, yesterday was the follow-up with the thoracic surgeon. Very uneventful, although after looking at the chest x-ray that was taken right before my appointment, that chunk of lung he took out seemed a lot larger than I had previously visualized (even though it was probably only about 2% of my total lung tissue).
A nurse took my BP and said, "119 over 72. That's awesome!" I smiled smugly at The Rev., who proceeded to roll her eyes so far back into her head that I did in fact see her optic nerves.
Awesome? Well, yes, but I already knew that.
Oh, in answer to the question I had the other day, the doc said they got the chunk out by deploying some sort of bag with a drawstring around the specimen, then cinching it tight before taking it out through the thorascopy port. (They had deflated my lung in order to operate on it, using a breathing tube and a ventilator to keep my right lung working. The lung tissue folds easily when deflated.)
Part four of the video shows how this happens. The diseased area is isolated with staples and removed from the rest of the lung, then placed in a bag to avoid contamination of other areas of the chest cavity. Cool!
At the end of the day, I was sent home and told the surgeon didn't need to see me again. I felt like I had been spurned following a one-night stand. It was the same story I had heard from my urologist as well as the surgeon who did the RPLND. Why are these surgeons so afraid of commitment?
Back to surveillance!
Pathologist: "It's cancer."
[Dissolve to...]
Pathologist: "Sorry, I was smoking crack, is isn't cancer."
[Cut to title with voiceover]
Announcer: "Who cares what the hell it is?"
It's
Frank's Thoracoscopy!
Check it out on video (it's in four parts, this is part one of four). No, it's not my actual surgery, but a close facsimile thereof. Although not for the squeamish, I happen to find it very cool.
Anyhoo, yesterday was the follow-up with the thoracic surgeon. Very uneventful, although after looking at the chest x-ray that was taken right before my appointment, that chunk of lung he took out seemed a lot larger than I had previously visualized (even though it was probably only about 2% of my total lung tissue).
A nurse took my BP and said, "119 over 72. That's awesome!" I smiled smugly at The Rev., who proceeded to roll her eyes so far back into her head that I did in fact see her optic nerves.
Awesome? Well, yes, but I already knew that.
Oh, in answer to the question I had the other day, the doc said they got the chunk out by deploying some sort of bag with a drawstring around the specimen, then cinching it tight before taking it out through the thorascopy port. (They had deflated my lung in order to operate on it, using a breathing tube and a ventilator to keep my right lung working. The lung tissue folds easily when deflated.)
Part four of the video shows how this happens. The diseased area is isolated with staples and removed from the rest of the lung, then placed in a bag to avoid contamination of other areas of the chest cavity. Cool!
At the end of the day, I was sent home and told the surgeon didn't need to see me again. I felt like I had been spurned following a one-night stand. It was the same story I had heard from my urologist as well as the surgeon who did the RPLND. Why are these surgeons so afraid of commitment?
Back to surveillance!
Friday, May 19, 2006
More fun in CT land

Labels:
CT,
flying,
surveillance,
TC,
teratoma,
thoracoscopy
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
The FFR is here!
Got a call from Dr. V. (the onc) today.
me: "What's up?"
Dr. V.: "Well, the 'FFR' is here."
me: "What's that?"
Dr. V.: "The final effin' report."
That's a verbatim quote by the way; I'm not sure the f-word is in Dr. V.'s vocabulary. Anyway, the final pathology results are in from the local lab. Turns out the mass that was removed was not active germ cell cancer after all as the preliminary report said, but was metastasized teratoma, as we had originally expected. Phew! Good news for now.
He had also spoken with the pros from Indianapolis, and they want the pathology slides so they can do their own study and report. Works for me. More news as it develops...
me: "What's up?"
Dr. V.: "Well, the 'FFR' is here."
me: "What's that?"
Dr. V.: "The final effin' report."
That's a verbatim quote by the way; I'm not sure the f-word is in Dr. V.'s vocabulary. Anyway, the final pathology results are in from the local lab. Turns out the mass that was removed was not active germ cell cancer after all as the preliminary report said, but was metastasized teratoma, as we had originally expected. Phew! Good news for now.
He had also spoken with the pros from Indianapolis, and they want the pathology slides so they can do their own study and report. Works for me. More news as it develops...
Thursday, January 13, 2005
the low down diagnosis
Here's what we found out on Wednesday Jan 12, 2005 (from Frank's email to Schmink)
the nitty gritty:
the nitty gritty:
--
The pathology report says the tumor was mixed germ cell, 95% embryonal,
less than 5% mature teratoma, focal seminona.
It was classed pT2 (tumor extends through tunica albuginea with vascular/lymphatic invasion).
CT scan shows: "There is a large inhomogeneous mass seen in the left periaortic area that
measures 6 cm x 5 cm in size. This displaces the left renal vein anteriorly and extends over
routine 7 mm images anterior to the left psoas into the region of the left common iliac artery."
(the orchicetomy was on the left side) N.B - the onc thinks the size is underestimated by
at least 2 cm (in the head-to-toe measurement).
Bloodwork on 12/27 (10 days before the orchiectomy):
LDH 258, AFP 9897, B-HCG 372
Bloodwork on 1/10 (5 days after the orchiectomy):
LDH 216, AFP 9464, B-HCG 451
So it's non-seminoma that has metastatized into the retroperitoneal lymph system,
with a big frickin mass sitting on my aorta.
The urologist suggests chemo first and maybe surgery later after the mass has shrunk.
The oncologist/hematologist suggests the same, except he will probably insist on
surgery after chemo.
The urologist isn't big into staging; the oncologist said pT2, N3, S2; or stage IIC.
Here's the plan: I go get a port-a-cath next week, then start chemo on the 24th.
3 rounds of BEP (maybe a fourth if the tumor markers don't fall like they should) with Neupogen
between rounds; 12 weeks total (more if 4 rounds).
Intermediate CT scans, with the likelihood of surgery after the chemo is done.
Labels:
BEP,
chemotherapy,
CT,
nonseminoma,
pathology,
TC,
teratoma,
tumor markers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)